Measuring the costs of outreach motivational interviewing for smoking cessation and relapse prevention among low-income pregnant women

TitleMeasuring the costs of outreach motivational interviewing for smoking cessation and relapse prevention among low-income pregnant women
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2009
AuthorsRuger, JP, Emmons, KM, Kearney, MH, Weinstein, MC
JournalBMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Volume9
Pagination46
Publication Languageeng
ISBN Number1471-2393 (Electronic)1471-2393 (Linking)
Accession Number19775455
Keywords*Interview, Psychological, *Motivation, Cohort Studies, Community-Institutional Relations/*economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis/*methods, Direct Service Costs, Female, Health Resources/economics/utilization, Humans, Poverty/psychology, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications/etiology/*prevention & control/psychology, Self Efficacy, Smoking Cessation/*economics/methods
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Economic theory provides the philosophical foundation for valuing costs in judging medical and public health interventions. When evaluating smoking cessation interventions, accurate data on costs are essential for understanding resource consumption. Smoking cessation interventions, for which prior data on resource costs are typically not available, present special challenges. We develop a micro-costing methodology for estimating the real resource costs of outreach motivational interviewing (MI) for smoking cessation and relapse prevention among low-income pregnant women and report results from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) employing the methodology. Methodological standards in cost analysis are necessary for comparison and uniformity in analysis across interventions. Estimating the costs of outreach programs is critical for understanding the economics of reaching underserved and hard-to-reach populations. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial (1997-2000) collecting primary cost data for intervention. A sample of 302 low-income pregnant women was recruited from multiple obstetrical sites in the Boston metropolitan area. MI delivered by outreach health nurses vs. usual care (UC), with economic costs as the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The total cost of the MI intervention for 156 participants was $48,672 or $312 per participant. The total cost of $311.8 per participant for the MI intervention compared with a cost of $4.82 per participant for usual care, a difference of $307 ([CI], $289.2 to $322.8). The total fixed costs of the MI were $3,930 and the total variable costs of the MI were $44,710. The total expected program costs for delivering MI to 500 participants would be 147,430, assuming no economies of scale in program delivery. The main cost components of outreach MI were intervention delivery, travel time, scheduling, and training. CONCLUSION: Grounded in economic theory, this methodology systematically identifies and measures resource utilization, using a process tracking system and calculates both component-specific and total costs of outreach MI. The methodology could help improve collection of accurate data on costs and estimates of the real resource costs of interventions alongside clinical trials and improve the validity and reliability of estimates of resource costs for interventions targeted at underserved and hard-to-reach populations.

URLhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19775455
Go to top