Title | Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2001 |
Authors | Chambless, DL, Ollendick, TH |
Journal | Annual Review of Psychology |
Volume | 52 |
Pagination | 685-716 |
Publication Language | eng |
ISBN Number | 0066-4308 (Print)0066-4308 (Linking) |
Accession Number | 11148322 |
Keywords | Humans, Mental Disorders/*therapy, Psychotherapy/*methods/*standards, Research/methods, Treatment Outcome |
Abstract | Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns abou research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process. |
URL | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11148322 |