Cognitive behavioral therapy plus motivational interviewing improves outcome for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary study

TitleCognitive behavioral therapy plus motivational interviewing improves outcome for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A preliminary study
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsMerlo, LJ, Storch, EA, Lehmkuhl, HD, Jacob, ML, Murphy, TK, Goodman, WK, Geffken, GR
JournalCognitive Behaviour Therapy
Volume39
Pagination24-27
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Place PublishedUnited Kingdom
Publication Languageeng
ISBN Number1650-60731651-2316
Accession Number2010-07789-003. First Author & Affiliation: Merlo, Lisa J.
KeywordsAnxiety, children, cognitive behavior therapy, Cognitive behavioral therapy, interviewing, Motivation, motivational interviewing, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder, Pediatrics, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Outcomes
Abstract

Lack of motivation may negatively impact cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) response for pediatric patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Motivational interviewing is a method for interacting with patients in order to decrease their ambivalence and support their self-efficacy in their efforts at behavior change. The authors present a preliminary randomized trial (N = 16) to evaluate the effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing (MI) as an adjunct to CBT. Patients aged 6 to 17 years who were participating in intensive family-based CBT for OCD were randomized to receive either CBT plus MI or CBT plus extra psychoeducation (PE) sessions. After four sessions, the mean Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) score for the CBT plus MI group was significantly lower than for the CBT plus psychoeducation group, t(14) = 2.51, p < .03, Cohen's d = 1.34. In addition, the degree of reduction in CY-BOCS scores was significantly greater, t(14) = 2.14, p = .05, Cohen's d = 1.02, for the CBT plus MI group (mean Δ = 16.75, SD = 9.66) than for the CBT plus psychoeducation group (mean Δ = 8.13, SD = 6.01). This effect decreased over time, and scores at posttreatment were not significantly different. However, participants in the MI group completed treatment on average three sessions earlier than those in the psychoeducation group, providing support for the utility of MI in facilitating rapid improvement and minimizing the burden of treatment for families. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

URLhttp://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-07789-003&login.asp&site=ehost-live&scope=sitelmerlo@ufl.eduhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2861340/pdf/nihms193939.pdf
Go to top